The good bits that seem to meet your requirements are:
- There isn't any explicit sexual content. No sex scenes at all. There is the presence of romantic scenes, and those will be increased in future chapters and some 'tasteful fade-to-black' scenes in the future. This story is definitely not erotica in any shape or form.
- There isn't any active gay/lesbian romances thus far in the story. There will be a couple mentioned in future chapters (not written for several months, yet). These relationships will be to flesh out the character's motivations and won't be explored explicity.
- There isn't anything related to gender-bender or harem in any way.

The bad bits that could cause you to 'nope-out' of reading the story are:
- The story is set in a fantasy setting that has no correlation to the real world as we know it. Thus it has the presence of pantheistic and/or pagan-inspired belief systems as well as magic. The society believes in multiple gods and several hierarchies of those gods. The gods aren't manifest in the world but are seen as avatars of key aspects of reality. They are a removed set of archetypal concepts that most people see as natural phenomena, but I try to leave some ambiguity on if they exist, if they don't exist, or if there is a unifying 'creator' in the background.
- The world the story is set in is a brutal one. The genre could be described as Grimdark Swords & Sorcery. Many people die every day. The world is in decline from a previous set of civilizations and is now descending into barbarity. There are some pockets of civilization left, and some groups that still believe in the rule of law or tradition, but many have fallen to being hordes of brutes that kill and pillage to survive.
- Although the tone I'm going for is low-fantasy, there is the presence of supernatural elements in the story. There are otherworldly entities (alien consciousnesses) that work in the shadows. There are individuals that have made pacts, performed human/blood sacrifices, or drain energy from the world to become immortal in desperation against death or aging. There is the presence of ghosts or shades (echoes of the spirit) of the dead. There is divination (although seen as a good art to help others, but not always good), elementalism, ancestor worship, curses/hexes, blessings/devotions, and necromancy (which in most hands is seen as being more like exorcism where a 'priest' can settle an earthbound spirit and allow it to transcend... Not so much the raising or commanding of the dead, but the later can happen in the hands of a sorcerer).
- There is violence in the story. Many of the characters have set moralities and ethics, but the situations of the world often overwhelm them or throw those beliefs into chaos. There is the presence of violence in the story, and although I try to tone it down and keep it on point, sometimes it can be disturbing. When a monster performs violence, it is due to their inhumanity or overwhelming vices, usually. When a person commits violence it is an exploration of morality, ethics, the weakness of their character, or in the case of one specific character... Her relation to a blood curse that follows her around and tempts her much like a possessing demonic force. Please note there are no typical demons or angels in this story. Ultimately, the story is a complicated morality-play that focuses on several character's journeys as they explore what it means to be 'good,' 'bad,' or to seek some form of personal redemption for their individual failings/burdens.
- Oh, and as a fair warning from a purely technical viewpoint... I do firmly believe in the advice mentioned by Brian Sanderson about simple-but-varied dialogue tags. This particular story doesn't use that advice. I'm drawing upon a style from older stories (Greek epics, Viking sagas, Biblical parables, and Medieval tales like Morte D'Arthur by Malory) for the dialogue organization. As well, the story is highly visually focused (there are reasons for that which will become more pronounced in the story). Almost all of the dialogue tags are complex and are interspersed with description. This is a stylistic element to make it seem less like a novel being read and more like a tale being told by someone inside that world while focusing on things they would find worth sharing. I understand this can give some people headaches if they like to skim through a story quickly or are diehard fans of literary fiction dictates over speculative fiction adventurousness.

If you find that you want to do a review trade, the specifications that you mentioned would be focused on:
- Characters and their motivations. Whether they seem believable and any concerns with them.
- Plot development and general interest in the story. What works or doesn't work, if there are any plot-holes I overlooked, or if anything seems too contrived.
- A general sense of if you would be interested in the story and would continue reading it even despite all the warnings above.
* I mostly have grammar and spelling under control, and have some good readers that point those concerns out for me, but if you notice anything please let me know so I can fix it.

When I review other's work, I mostly focus on elements of character, motivation, and plot-line. I'm fairly forgiving with elements of grammar and spelling (especially if the author isn't a native english speaker as I understand the complexities of using a different language for creative expression). If I notice some glaring things, I might post up a list of suggested edits in the comments. I won't post edits or suggestions in the reviews as I see that as too permanent and overbearing on a work (given that reviews tend to be permanent things that don't get updated).

Grammar and spelling stuff can get updated with revision. I like to focus on the actual 'spirit' of the work. What I find is powerful with it, or what I find as lacking in some respect. I'm not a harsh reviewer and prefer to give a story the benefit of the doubt, even if it's something that I might not enjoy personally. The only harshness I have in reviews is mentionings of technique and artistic critique. If something desperately needs another few revisions, I'll say so. I generally prefer stories with high character investment, lots of detail/description, a fair deal of world-building, and heavy atmosphere. I also have a pet-peeve towards single line paragraphs if they are used too often, excessive amounts of 'tell and not show,' or 'removed-passive-voice' in descriptions, and formulaic dialogue tags with no variation. (1,000 paragraphs of, "Bob Said.") Oh, and the lack of the oxford comma in a work can make my eyes twitch. I also start to cringe if authors include really badly done romantic or ridiculously graphic sex scenes in their works, but I don't think your story will have that present.